Operating business72% entry signalMarket screen5 sourced figuresExecution decidesdistribution

Collision Repair Shop Acquisition

Prepared 2026-09-09

The industry — Automotive body, paint and interior repair and maintenance

Base industry report for 811121 →
Establishments · CanadaA
4,858
with employees
Under 10 employeesA
75%
most common size: 1–4
Establishments · USA
34,665
Employment · USA
239,251
6.9 per establishment
Payroll · USA
$13.6B
$57k per employee

Of 4,858 Canadian establishments with employees, 75% have fewer than ten — an industry of very small operators.

Entry signal — what decides who wins here

Execution decides
Structure decides One thing must be true Execution decides

The hurdles here are ones a better operator clears. That is not a promise of success — it is the absence of a structural reason you cannot win.

What you would have to beat

Get to the buyer. The product is reachable and the need is real; the channel is owned by someone else, and a route to it — a partner, a reseller, a trade relationship, a book of clients bought outright — is what has to be built.

How it was read
Binding constraintUNVERIFIEDdistribution — Executional — a better operator can move it.
How fragmented the field isA75% of establishments have fewer than ten employees — Fragmented — there is share to take and no scale operator to displace.
What it costs to be in the businessUNVERIFIEDmedium capital — The structural profile of subsector 811, inherited by every industry beneath it.
How many new establishments are still tradingA
Other Services (except Public Administration), US · opened 2020
85.2%
1 year
71.8%
3 years
60%
5 years
42.1%
10 years
opened 2015

Measured, not forecast: the share of US establishments opening in one year that were still active later. It counts good operators and bad ones together, which is exactly why it is the honest answer to “what are the odds”. It is for the whole sector rather than this market, and the ten-year figure comes from an older cohort because no younger one has reached ten years.

This is not a probability of success, and it is not a verdict on you. No survival probability is published per market, and inventing one would be worse than saying so. What the bar reads is how much of the outcome sits inside an operator's control: green means the hurdles are ones a better operator clears, red means the binding constraint is capital, an asset or a permission rather than execution. Someone arriving with an advantage this screen did not assume can win a market shown in red.

Companies named in this market · 6

The binding constraint — distribution

The customer is not the driver, it is the insurer. Direct repair programme referrals decide which bays fill, and the networks that hold those agreements are consolidating fast: the top five now take 31.7% of collision revenue, and Boyd alone ran 1,312 locations on $3.1B of 2025 sales while adding 70 shops in the year and then buying 258 more. A single-shop buyer competes with that balance sheet for the same acquisitions and with its DRP agreements for the same cars. Cycle times, parts procurement and calibration equipment for ADAS all favour scale.

Market scalenationalunit: one shop

A collision shop repairs cars from its own city, but the insurer referral networks that fill its bays are national — which is why the consolidators' per-location economics are the right benchmark for buying one.

Handle — Boyd Group's location count. Boyd reports both revenue and locations, so the industry's per-shop economics fall out of two figures. That number is what a buyer's pro forma has to beat, on a shop that will not have Boyd's parts procurement or DRP agreements.

Boyd Group sales, FY2025A $3.1B, +2.4%
Boyd collision locationsA 1,312
Top-five network share of collision revenueB 31.7%
Revenue per consolidator shop~$2.36M a yearB

$3.1B of FY2025 sales divided by 1,312 locations. Derived from two reported figures. An independent shop without DRP volume should expect materially less.

I

Who you would be competing with

The operators already at scale here, and whoever is buying these businesses. In most of these industries the competition an entrant meets is local, so this is who sets the terms rather than a list of everyone in the trade.

Largest operator
Boyd Group Services (TSX: BYD, Canadian — Winnipeg)
Scale
FY2025 sales $3.1B, +2.4%; 1,312 collision locations, 70 added in 2025 (43 acquired, 27 greenfield), plus the subsequent Joe Hudson's acquisition of 258 locations in the US southeast
Concentration
Top five collision networks hold 31.7% of industry revenue
Others in the field
Crash Champions/Service King, Caliber Collision, Driven Brands, Fix Network (Canadian), CSN Collision (Canadian), plus the independent single-shop majority
Lock-in mechanism
Not assessed — screened before diligence
Price movement
Not assessed
Is the buyer consolidating?
Yes
F

Financials & market size — sourced

Figures that came from a filing, a results release or reputable reporting, each carrying its evidence tier.

Boyd Group sales, FY2025A $3.1B, +2.4% YoY
Boyd collision locationsA 1,312
Boyd locations added in 2025A 70 (43 acquisitions, 27 start-ups)
Joe Hudson's Collision Center acquisitionA 258 locations, US southeast
Top-five network share of collision revenueB 31.7%
$

Market size, derived

Built from the competitor set upward rather than quoted from a forecast. Published TAMs in these categories are frequently reverse-engineered from each other, so any published figure is checked against the vendor arithmetic rather than trusted on its own.

Revenue floor
$3.1B

Disclosed revenue from 1 of 3 named vendors. The market is at least this large.

Implied total — revenue ÷ share
—

No vendor has both a disclosed revenue and a published share.

Published forecast
—Floor only

Only a revenue floor is known — the true market is larger by whatever the undisclosed vendors earn.

Competitor set · 3 named · 1 disclose revenue

NameRevenueShareNote
Boyd Group ServicesTSX: BYDA $3.1B — FY2025 sales
Caliber Collision / Crash Champions / Driven BrandsB not disclosed — Private or not separately disclosed; part of the 31.7% top-five block
Fix Network / CSN CollisionC not disclosed — Canadian franchise networks; not disclosed

Evidence

Evidence. Operator financials and industry-structure figures on this record ARE sourced (tier A/B, see the financials block). The cut factor and reasoning remain analyst judgment and were not tested against operators.

#

Where the industry talks

The associations, forums and events where people in this trade actually talk shop — where to listen before entering, and where the first customers are found. Each link was opened on the date shown.

AssociationCanadaA
Automotive Industries Association of Canada (AIA Canada)
aiacanada.com

National auto-care trade body covering collision and mechanical sectors; says 'thousands of members' but gives no figure.

Checked 2026-09-22
EventCanadaA
Canadian Collision Industry Forum (CCIF)
collision.aiacanada.com

AIA Canada's collision meetings for repairers, insurers, suppliers; ccif.ca redirects here. Canada Night 3 Nov 2026; CCIF Toronto 30 Mar–1 Apr 2027.

Checked 2026-09-22
AssociationUSA
Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS)
scrs.com · 6,000 members (2026-09)

Collision repair businesses represented, 'over 6,000' per its homepage; runs Repairer Driven Education at SEMA and Repairer Driven News.

Checked 2026-09-22
EventUSA
Collision Industry Conference (CIC)
ciclink.com

Open quarterly industry forum of repairers, insurers and suppliers (not a trade association); next meeting 3 Nov 2026, Las Vegas.

Checked 2026-09-22
PublicationCanadaC
Collision Repair magazine
collisionrepairmag.com

Canadian collision trade magazine (Media Matters, Toronto); blocked automated access (HTTP 403). Search results show it live.

Checked 2026-09-22
PublicationUSA
Autobody News
autobodynews.com

Free monthly for collision shop owners/managers; claims 36,000+ shops reached; articles dated 21 Sep 2026.

Checked 2026-09-22
EventNorth AmericaA
SEMA Show
semashow.com

3–6 Nov 2026, Las Vegas Convention Center; the collision track is SCRS's Repairer Driven Education held alongside it.

Checked 2026-09-22

Shop owners talk at CCIF and CIC meetings rather than online; Reddit refused automated access so r/Autobody was left off.

↔

Software serving this industry

Vertical software markets filed along the same branch of NAICS — who sells to these businesses, and who an entrant would have to displace.

Vertical softwareScreenedsame industry
Collision Repair & Auto Body Estimating SoftwareOne thing must be true
binding constraint: incumbent vulnerability
Incumbent CCC Intelligent Solutions (NYSE: CCCS) — CCC ONE estimating, repair management and parts

Collision is not mechanical repair with paint on it — the insurer sits in the middle. In the independent mechanical shop (see the 8111 record) the shop owner is the buyer and picks a shop-management system on its merits, which is why Tekmetric, Shopmonkey and AutoLeap could win shops one at a time. In collision the bill is usually paid by an insurer, the estimate has to be written in an estimating system the insurer's claims desk accepts, and direct-repair programmes (DRPs) route the work. The shop pays the subscription; the insurer largely chooses it. A 2019 Collision Advice–CRASH Network survey found 51.2% of Audatex users and 35% of Mitchell users named an insurer mandate as their main reason for having it, and 30.3% of shops ran more than one estimating system [B]. Shopmonkey, which a vertical-software list files under auto body, is general auto repair: its home page lists auto repair, tire, quick lube, heavy duty and wrap/detail shops and never mentions collision or an estimating integration [C]. The incumbent is a listed, 41%-margin network. CCC Intelligent Solutions (NYSE: CCCS) reported $1.057B of FY2025 revenue (+12%) and $436.0M adjusted EBITDA (41%) [A]. Its 10-K says it serves more than 300 insurers including 27 of the top 30 US auto carriers, more than 30,500 repair facilities and 6,000+ parts and diagnostics suppliers, and that its technology "facilitates the majority of the automotive insurance DRP in the U.S." [A]. Repair Solutions — software sold to shops — was about 43% of 2025 revenue, nearly all of it software [A]; that implies roughly $450M a year from repairers alone. In the 2019 survey 83.7% of shops had CCC installed against 27.9% for Mitchell and 23.7% for Audatex [B]. The other two seats are private-equity owned and buying. Mitchell sits inside Enlyte (Stone Point Capital bought it from KKR and Elliott in 2018) [B] and agreed in December 2025 to buy PartsTrader, the insurer-backed parts-procurement marketplace [B]. Solera — Audatex, Qapter — was taken private by Vista Equity Partners for about $6.5B including net debt in 2015 [B]. Even the parts layer has a new private-equity owner: Francisco Partners bought a majority of OEConnection (CollisionLink) in November 2025 [B]. Where the money is going is around the estimate, not into it. Tractable (AI photo estimating, sold mainly to insurers; $65M Series E led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2, 2023) [B], Partly (AI parts identification; $50M at a $500M valuation led by DST Global, June 2026) [B] and Revv (ADAS calibration reporting for body and mechanical shops; $20M Series A led by Left Lane Capital, 2024) [B] all sell tools that plug into the estimating system rather than replace it. Canada is the same, only more so: in BC the single insurer, ICBC, runs its repair programme on Mitchell's estimating tools [A], so a BC body shop's software choice follows the insurer, not the shop. Incumbent vulnerability decides it — there is no shop-by-shop wedge into a market where the payer picks the system.

NAICS 8111219 vendors named6 sourced figuresOpen →
Vertical softwareScreenedfiled at 8111
Independent Auto Repair Shop SoftwareOne thing must be true
binding constraint: incumbent vulnerability
Incumbent Tekmetric and Shop-Ware, against Mitchell 1 inside Snap-on

Recently and thoroughly consolidated, with parts-catalogue and labour-guide data licensing acting as a real barrier. The adjacent dealership market (441110) has a far sharper opening — see that study. Sourced update 2026-09-18: the "nothing is disclosed" note on this record was too strong. Mitchell 1 sits inside Snap-on's Repair Systems & Information Group, which reported $1,877.1M of 2025 net sales (+4.4%) at a 26.7% operating margin [A]. That is not a software figure — the segment is mostly diagnostics hardware, undercar equipment and information services — but it is a hard ceiling and a hard statement about the incumbent's balance sheet. The cut stands.

NAICS 81114 vendors named5 sourced figuresOpen →